首页> 外文OA文献 >Applications of Different Weighting Schemes to Improve Pathway-Based Analysis
【2h】

Applications of Different Weighting Schemes to Improve Pathway-Based Analysis

机译:不同加权方案在基于路径的分析中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conventionally, pathway-based analysis assumes that genes in a pathway equally contribute to a biological function, thus assigning uniform weight to genes. However, this assumption has been proved incorrect, and applying uniform weight in the pathway analysis may not be an appropriate approach for the tasks like molecular classification of diseases, as genes in a functional group may have different predicting power. Hence, we propose to use different weights to genes in pathway-based analysis and devise four weighting schemes. We applied them in two existing pathway analysis methods using both real and simulated gene expression data for pathways. Among all schemes, random weighting scheme, which generates random weights and selects optimal weights minimizing an objective function, performs best in terms of P value or error rate reduction. Weighting changes pathway scoring and brings up some new significant pathways, leading to the detection of disease-related genes that are missed under uniform weight.
机译:常规上,基于途径的分析假设途径中的基因同样有助于生物学功能,因此为基因分配了均匀的权重。但是,该假设已被证明是不正确的,并且在路径分析中应用统一权重可能不适用于诸如疾病的分子分类之类的任务,因为功能组中的基因可能具有不同的预测能力。因此,我们建议在基于路径的分析中对基因使用不同的权重,并设计四种加权方案。我们将它们应用在使用路径的真实和模拟基因表达数据的两种现有路径分析方法中。在所有方案中,随机加权方案会产生随机权重并选择使目标函数最小的最佳权重,因此在P值或错误率降低方面表现最佳。加权改变了路径得分并提出了一些新的重要路径,从而导致检测出与疾病相关的基因,这些基因在统一的权重下会丢失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号